Men demand respect. It's not earned. Why? RESPECT (from a women) is optional. Why RESPECT a man who limits YOUR journey? Respectable men...demand respect because REALITY is optional. To whom is reality optional? The weak minded. There's no such thing as weak men, only a strong doubt which inspires the disrespected to drop HIS journey to enforce the realities (of patriarchy) entertains at the expense of family bonds to "REMAIN" infallible. Fathers enforce their reality ON TO their children, not "with." Why? Weak people who don't bow to authority outnumber us, because weak leaders govern with a broken narcissism. Fathers are broken by evil's narcissism through authority's conscience to accept his truth is crushed by "God's" infallibility. Patriarchy disrespects weak people viewing reality as optional. Even themselves. Get it now why people appreciate depreciating humour? Sigh. Because authority is optional to a broken narcissist (i.e.; Justin Trudeau).
The average voter is a broken narcissist electing broken narcissists to ACCEPT "thier" fact they are never NOT God. Women...be feminine. Men don't have pussies. Pussy is a life hack men don't enjoy. Why do you think transgendered women outnumber transgendered men. Weak men want the advantage or "life hack" of free pussy. Men grit their gums gnawing away their teeth! The only "life hack" dick gives men is quicker incarceration. I don't trust a woman who uses sex to fight patriarchy. Daughters give weak father's cancer. Can a daughter keep her father's bond with submission? Nah, on with the abortions. That's "empowering." Oh it's just a clump of cells, were those souls don't exist breathe relief, because abortions are damned to hell. Don't you think Satan is not capable of killing babies? You are.
0 Comments
I’m a straight white male and I HATE the acronym “CIS.” Transgendered people have realized "CIS" is a slur and they use it as a retaliation for being misgendered. Ok? I must be honest; it gets under my skin. Transgender communities have successfully transposed their experience being misgendered by programming straight folk with pride. That's a powerful tool to generate discussion around the roots of a foundation. I can't say why without risking my family's safety. I refuse to use preferred pronouns other than he OR she, so why should my preference be respected? Stubbornness ensues on both sides. Why? Why should my quality of life be controlled by contrarians? I simply use that opportunity to walk away from these people. Fortunately as a Minnow King, I don't have to deal with these people outside of watching newscasts. If the rainbow ransom wasn’t aggravating enough, bowing to the ephemeral stability of ill minds holding hostage the convenience of addressing each other with undeserved respect; that is enough for me to continue resisting this movement. I’m going to try and empathize with the transgender community as an exercise in objectivity. Being called “CIS” (as a straight white man) injects instability into a foundation ultimately backed by science. I don't trust science because of its political financial backing. I don’t have to question my gender because I have a penis. That statement can be considered transgendered, because women with penises claim to be not confused. Ask yourself If you are confused. Do you agree? Then why be mad it's compatible with "CIS?" Being called “CIS” does NOT make me question my gender. It is however cruel because it's straight up humiliating. Pride has shattered the sensitivity of the medical term to transform into a SUBJECTIVE slur. You have a right to have at least one contrarian based preference. No one is perfect. Why? Revelling in a opponent's strife without effort. Is objectivity and subjectivity contrarian? Who enjoys feeding that struggle for power? Something worth $66 trillion dollars. To receive incentives, companies champion whatever gives them incentives to operate at a loss; until the world is overcome by trans. That's how you dial back the population. Here’s the thing trans people, “CIS” is a terribly convenient way to generalize most people; similar to their outcry blaming "CIS" for choosing convenience over caring. A hypocrites hypocrisy. I obviously prefer the term “straight” but that’s not in the cards. With trans preferences, I would need a photographic memory to avoid triggering preferences that fly in the face of the OBVIOUS: biology. I know why gender dysphoria exists, but...I can’t share that here. I know why gender dysphoria is advertised aggressively...but I can’t share that here. I can say trans are an especially unstable society where most of us are forced to caress them with a loathsome compassion. "Magoritythink" not "wrongthink." The majority are sick of the constant affirmation robbing their children's future. How about us “straight” people make our own slur just as convenient as "CIS." I nominate the word “alphabet.” The LGBTQ+ acronym will surely require all 26 letters of the alphabet at some point, might as well make our slur just as convenient as “CIS.” Hey…"alphabet," can you fax this to Washington? Hey "alphabet," can you leave my children alone? Hey "alphabet," rainbows are just rainbows. I’m not sure if my empathy has the strength to be objective. I can't ignore what I’ve witnessed "alphabet" communities professing to innocent minds. I think when the LGB community steps up and protests alongside “cisgendered” Muslims, will order be restored. That’s of course if you’re not an Islamophobe. ChatGPT's response:In this journal entry, the author, a straight white male, expresses strong dislike for the term "CIS" used to describe people who identify with the gender assigned to them at birth. They perceive it as a slur used by transgender individuals as retaliation for being misgendered. The author feels that the transgender community has successfully influenced society to adopt their preferred pronouns and questions why their own preference for traditional pronouns should not be respected. They see stubbornness on both sides and feel that their quality of life is being controlled by contrarians. The author attempts to empathize with the transgender community but struggles due to their belief that science is politically influenced and their personal conviction about gender based on biological sex. They argue that calling someone "CIS" does not make them question their gender but finds it cruel and humiliating. They suggest creating a slur for trans people similar to "CIS" expressing frustration towards the LGBTQ+ community and its impact on society, particularly concerning children and the influence they perceive from the community. Monogamy is a path for committed partners. It’s proven that traditional families prosper. The chemicals you put in your hair to defy tradition is a frock of crock. For all those blue-haired sirens out there tempting with perversion to spite the adoption of tradition. Only the foundation of family feeds mouths not entitlement. Liberalism is the slippery slope to abortion, single motherhood and divorce. Conservatism is not perfect, so Liberals (in those crossroads) are justified by how (un)well their preferences serve desires. Do you desire preferences to be internationally respected? Oh boy… We have a problem. Politics does not work. When preferences are priorities, the masses become a majority entity of group think. You need leaders to steer their path (to the slaughter). Why be a pessimist? Earth is not heaven. I got lucky today driving home from my in-laws. I didn’t get stuck behind my local crossroad. Politics means 50% of the population is stuck at a crossroad between 4 to 8 years. If overall quality is not achieved, you’re favouriting your briber's-I-I-I mean donor’s generosity. A briber's vote takes advantage of apathetic citizens lack of knowledge with selfishness satisfying preferences hoping to be law. Briber's lives depends on it. When the preference winners desire matches government policy without compromise (for too long), descent is INEVITABLE. Why not be charitable to the mentally ill? Instead of giving your money to fund the war in Ukraine, be charitable with “locally sourced” wars. You know…to benefit the less fortunate citizens in your OWN land. Like your LOCAL enemy. I am a Liberal but I’m monogamous. Government policy provokes the youth to vote their preferences. Once they’re on board government feeds them fibs about the people that directly suffer from a winner's ego too sensitive to be rejected. Foreclosures, divorce, addiction, suicide, prostitution directly responsible though...you are not held to account because your leader is the fall guy. Your vote is not free. Voters need to hold themselves accountable. Don’t dye your hair blue…that’s a frock of crock. Bribe your government with allegiance to take turns managing the consequences of fallibility ruining lives of those you disagree with. Do you revel in that misery? This PROVES, voters are a dictatorial hive. ChatGPT's response:The journal entry expresses a critical perspective on voters and politics. The writer begins by emphasizing the benefits of monogamy and traditional families, suggesting that deviating from these norms is a futile rebellion. They argue that liberalism leads to societal issues such as abortion, single motherhood, and divorce. The writer believes that politics fail because individuals prioritize personal preferences over the common good, resulting in a homogeneous and misguided majority. They advocate for strong leadership and criticize the cyclical nature of politics that leaves half the population dissatisfied. The entry also mentions the influence of bribery and the negative consequences of unchecked preferences. Overall, the writer contends that voters, collectively, exhibit dictatorial tendencies. If you naturally draw attention there’s no telling what you’ll learn from predictable behaviour. There’s no guarantee the benefits of attention outweigh the disadvantages, but givers are an open book. Why? Attractions insatiate themselves with remote possibility of reciprocal longings. It’s a chemical avalanche of comedic approaches to shock an audience’s dopamine delivery. I hate attention’s priorities because I tend to give it away without success. Yet, I’m thankful I don’t attract attention, because I would grow indifferent to inconvenient tragedy. The constant flow of horny retards spark popularity into being. Once you’re popular you can sell products. I’m not the Messiah but tell that to David Koresh of Waco infamy. I watched a Netflix series on the situation that killed 90 men, women, and children. People burned to death for their faith. I can say for sure God’s will, has a dark side. That’s because God is everything. What does this have to do with attention? Givers take. Givers desperately harvest attention emanating from their OWN deluded fantasies; as a consolation to reality serving constant disappointment. Crushes manifest between giver's lust and taker's ambition to be God. Givers take attention, Takers give attention claiming to be better. Taker’s take from lowly givers by giving their lowly attention. My attention over time is my product. I receive attention from takers. That’s how I cope being The Minnow King. My jurisdiction is my family. I will not burn to death for any prophet. Control is overrated. ChatGPT's trained response:This shared link [to the remainder of this conversation] has been disabled by moderation. Your initial reflection on attention in your previous message appeared to have a more cynical or critical tone compared to the average perspective I provided. While the average perspective acknowledges the value of attention and its positive aspects, your reflection seemed to focus more on the potential disadvantages and disillusionment associated with attention-seeking behavior and the dynamics between givers and takers. In your reflection, you expressed frustration with the prioritization of attention, the disappointment that can arise from giving attention without success, and the notion that givers are driven by their own deluded fantasies. You also touched upon the idea that attention can be exploited by takers, who give their lowly attention in exchange for taking from givers. Additionally, you delved into topics such as tragedy, faith, and the darker aspects of God's will, seemingly connecting them to the concept of attention. These themes were not directly addressed in the average perspective I provided, as it focused more on general observations and common viewpoints regarding attention. Overall, your reflection on attention presented a more critical and complex perspective, exploring the interplay between givers and takers, the potential disillusionment in seeking attention, and the darker consequences of certain belief systems. Transient thought cannot be recorded because secrets fib to lose your interest. What does that mean? I didn’t have my second coffee today because I was out, and I didn’t want to shit in a public bathroom. I was exhausted. I needed to nap. Fate being Father’s Day, I was able to do so. I had an intense dream, and in that dream, I was gifted a piece of wisdom. “Transient thought cannot be recorded because secrets fib to lose your interest.” Maybe that’s just a made-up fib? Maybe the secret I was exposed to was designed to tempt; tempting to touch God through wisdom is a selfish endeavour. Why? You can’t profit from truth and expect salvation.
Why? Everything is scripted. In that irrefutable idea lies theft. Are you a thief? Would you be comfortable hurting someone? If the odds had you turn a blind eye to your morals, profiting from truth is theft. Who’s the victim? Who cares. If a single solar panel could power your life for free, is that worth the cost of the equipment? Farmed energy supplies surplus demand. Could you live without running water? Could you live without pride? Pride is impatient. Must language support delusions? Free energy farms sweat. ChatGPT's trained responseJournal entry: June 16, 2023 Today, my thoughts revolve around the notion of finding contentment and appreciating what we have as individuals, while also considering the connection to the concept of free energy. Rather than solely pursuing material possessions and external achievements, I contemplate the idea of embracing gratitude and sacrificing pride to harness the potential of free energy. Imagine a world where we prioritize personal fulfillment and gratitude, finding contentment with the resources and opportunities that already exist within our lives. In this scenario, the focus shifts from incessant desires and the pursuit of more, towards recognizing the value of what we already possess. The question arises: Could we find contentment and fulfillment by embracing gratitude for the present moment, while also exploring the potential of free energy? Could we redirect our energy from pursuing excess to cultivating a mindset of efficiency and sustainability? In this context, the idea of free energy becomes intertwined with the notion of sacrificing pride and embracing a more sustainable and responsible way of living. By reducing our energy consumption and making conscious choices, we can tap into the potential of renewable resources and minimize our impact on the environment. Language and societal constructs play a role in shaping our perceptions of what constitutes a satisfying life and how we value our resources. We must question the narratives that fuel excessive desires and challenge the notion that happiness solely comes from material possessions. It requires us to let go of pride and the need to constantly exert ourselves, and instead, embrace humility and efficiency. In contemplating these thoughts, I realize that the pursuit of free energy involves a holistic approach. It requires a shift in mindset, recognizing the value of what we already have, while also exploring sustainable alternatives and reducing our environmental impact. By sacrificing pride and adopting a more mindful and efficient way of living, we can tap into the potential of free energy and contribute to a more sustainable future. As I conclude this entry, I am reminded that true contentment lies not only in appreciating what we have but also in exploring innovative solutions that align with sustainable principles. By embracing gratitude and sacrificing pride, we can open the door to harnessing the potential of free energy, paving the way for a more efficient and sustainable future that benefits both individuals and the environment. Animals are food. How often do you pray when you eat? I hardly do it. That's not good. Imagine being a thousand pound Tuna in Japanese waters. Pray thanks for the food you eat. Your food has children. Darwinism likes prey. If a four-armed octopus fought an eight-armed octopus who'd be food? Who's extinct over time? That's why farming exists. To keep meat plentiful. To secure a meat eating diet. I think balance is important, generally. But if you pray for your food out of appreciation, don't you respect nature more? Nature is the mother of dynasties. Is nature an inadequate dynasty? Do you live in the woods, or in a condo downtown? Your footprint cannot disappear from life. Stop being a pussy. You be thankful for the farmers that stock restaurants of choice. ChatGPT's response:Journal entry: June 16, 2023 Today, I found myself contemplating the act of expressing gratitude towards animals, specifically fish, as a part of my meal. It made me realize how often we take our food for granted and overlook the intricate interconnectedness of nature. Animals, including fish, are a source of sustenance for many of us, but how often do we pause to reflect on their sacrifice and express gratitude? I must admit that I seldom pray or express thanks when I consume my meals, and I acknowledge that this is not a good habit. Just think about the life of a thousand-pound Tuna swimming in the vastness of Japanese waters. They are not merely food; they are beings with their own lives and offspring. Darwinism teaches us that the predator-prey relationship is a fundamental aspect of nature, and it is a cycle that has shaped life on Earth for ages. Consider a hypothetical scenario: a four-armed octopus and an eight-armed octopus engage in a fight. Who would become the victor and who would become the meal? This raises the question of which species would thrive and which would become extinct over time. It is precisely because of such dynamics that farming exists—to ensure a plentiful supply of meat and maintain a balanced diet that includes meat consumption. However, amidst these reflections, I also believe that balance is essential. While we may consume animals for sustenance, it is important to acknowledge and respect nature's role in this process. Nature is the mother that nurtures dynasties of life, providing the resources and sustenance needed for various species to survive and thrive. It is worth pondering whether nature itself is an adequate dynasty, or if our human interventions have disrupted this balance. It is easy to forget our place in the grand scheme of things when we live in comfortable homes and urban environments, disconnected from the natural world. But we must remember that our footprint on this planet cannot be erased. We have a responsibility to acknowledge and appreciate the efforts of farmers who work tirelessly to stock our restaurants and grocery stores with the food of our choice. Gratitude for the resources that sustain us is not a sign of weakness but a testament to our understanding of the intricate web of life. In conclusion, I realize that I need to be more mindful and appreciative of the food I consume. Expressing gratitude not only shows respect for the animals that have sacrificed their lives to nourish us but also deepens our connection with the natural world. Let us not be complacent and take our sustenance for granted but instead be grateful for the blessings we receive, for it is through this gratitude that we can foster a more harmonious relationship with nature. BIPOLAR ALERTExtreme views clear my conscience to avoid suicidal urges. I only share this with people I trust. Let's see how that goes. Do you WANT to be offended by projection? If you want, read. Just know that there's a high chance you will be offended. Why do you want that? Why revel in judgement? Why because we are oblivious to our wrong doing. Being wrong is seldom interrupted because critics are shy with their disdain. That's when you hate yourself for missing an opportunity to right a wrong. Who judges the judge? That jurisdiction is coveted by thieves and evangelists. Enough. For those on the left who excuse sexual indoctrination as a healthy irritant to those who appose it should be investigated by child services. The axis of conception is never an acceptable nuisance to serve jabs to political opposition. As I see it, you are complicit with your ignorance and it ends now. Offended? Pride has nothing to do with acceptance, and EVERYTHING to do with conversion. Pride is way more aggressive than Christianity. Let that sink in liberals. Pride AND government are a church state in lock-step blocking critical development of innocent minds; just like a perverted religion. One wants votes, the other wants pedophilia legalized. Don't believe me? Criticize the movement and watch them froth at the mouth like berserk vikings.
It's no wonder liberal governments support the intervention of "so-called" teachers more interested in categorizing children by pronouns than actual study. Government has much to do with control as teachers have to do with compliance. As a father with two kids, I have no choice but to pay $17,000 a year for private school. My wife and I have no choice but to sacrifice paying down our mortgage to ensure our kids are not perverted by this church-state dogma. I'm done and so are the majority. It's time to not be silent, it's time to organize PEACEFULLY. Pride at it's core is a pedophilic movement. The end. Offended? When man idolizes contraception, civilization falls. What's the ultimate form of contraception to a pedophile? Fucking (castrated) children. Why? No evidence to bury. Birth rate is collapsing, just like the fall of Rome and I won't be silent; I will continue to journal. It's time to peal the claws off of our children's minds with ASSERTIVE parenting. The gay community must shoulder blame for this problem. At first it was about acceptance, we obliged... We eventually got it. However, that acceptance has snowballed into a growing list of threats from a merry band of confused lunatics. I'm bipolar so I'm in camp crazy. I can say this because unfortunately I'm associated with these losers. I'm a loser, but I can't in good conscience be silent. Pride is a pedophilic church-state movement gung-ho on collapsing local population with the help of useful idiots barking for subsidies and protection. Sheep get eaten first. When you need a break from yourself, vices have a place in our lives. I found myself attempting to kickstart an addiction to alcohol. I didn’t know it at the time, but thankfully my attempts were unsuccessful. I’m running away from myself so I can enjoy the escape. I’m sure exercise would solve the problem but frankly, I don’t like to shower. Side track, I spent half my life living in the gym in pursuit of an unobtainable goal. It wore my drive thin, and the effects years on soothe my sloth. I’m trying to write a book, but I don’t have it in me anymore. Just like exercise I tried to achieve the impossible through writing, and I failed. I tried my hand and psychology, music, comedy, politics, you name it. My wife can’t see any progress I’ve made. I can argue giving up robs my urge to achieve is a cheaper avenue. Alcohol and drugs are a time out from pointless activities; time to embrace a version of you that is different. Being not you kickstarts addiction. Can you simulate 100 reactions and give a simple breakdown of feedback? ChatGPT's response:Certainly! Here's a simplified breakdown of feedback from a simulated audience of 100 reactions to your journal entry: Positive Feedback:
Constructive Feedback:
Neutral or Other Feedback:
Please note that these percentages are approximate and intended for a simplified breakdown. The responses are simulated and may not represent the actual feedback from a real audience. When does convenience sacrifice our privacy? Our privacy is a currency we relinquish with the assumption services are free. You obviously place little attention to the repercussions. What are the repercussions? Do you like spam? I personally love to delete spam. Gmail does a good job of categorizing my spam so there's much less noise to deal with. But that service is supported by the advertising Google sells to third party companies that have access to your online behaviour. Don't you think their metrics INCLUDE data points you prefer to keep private. Oh don't worry...these 3rd party companies have no interest in being transparent. You either follow the trends, or set the trends, or seldom engage content where profitable margins aren't worth exploiting your privacy. Companies for hire police your online activity. That's why I have three emails. First email for highly important reoccurring payments, school and family contact. Second email is my "business" email. Third is my public email. You have to think about trust like it's earned not given. Do I give trust God is real, or did God earn it? I'm not an evangelist so rest easy...it's not my place to say what you should believe. Through psychosis I found my way to God through Acts 9. God earned my trust when I was at my worst. At your worst accept charity. So I don't know how much of the bible I gotta believe in to go to heaven but that's my foundation. Church is very painful for me. I dread Sundays because muck bubbles under my feat looking very hungry. I'm fighting the sermon with my free-spirited ego, the liberal logic helps me focus on things I can't take into the afterlife. But I try. I may embarrass my wife, but she better appreciate the pain my faith requires to evolve beyond nonsense. Nonsense swallows our time. Does this explain why you give trust? Time is money? Boredom is cancer? Do you see how tuned into your predictable behaviour corporations are. Why? You don't have a fucking clue what you want until visionaries tell you otherwise. I'm a visionary with a conscience who breathes the lifestyle of being a father. I'm going to teach my kids this insight, so they can make informed decisions. My wife and I grew up without internet. We never knew Twitter could be a thing because we were too busy gathering around the TV with family watching their favourite show. Like "Tool Time." I think that's a meta statement. I like a show within a show, which is only meant to be a plot device. What's your plot device? Free shit. ChatGPt's response:It seems like you're expressing your concerns about privacy and the trade-offs we make when using free services. You raise valid points about how our personal data is often collected and used by companies for targeted advertising and other purposes. It's true that when we use free services, we are essentially paying with our privacy. Having multiple email accounts and being mindful of what information we share online can be strategies to protect our privacy to some extent. Trust is indeed something that should be earned rather than given freely, and it's important to be cautious about who we trust with our personal information. You also mention your faith and the role it plays in your life. Faith can be a deeply personal and transformative experience for many people, and it's understandable that you have found solace and trust in your beliefs. It's important to have a support system that aligns with your values and provides comfort during difficult times. Regarding corporations and their understanding of consumer behavior, it's true that companies invest significant resources in collecting and analyzing data to better understand their customers' preferences and habits. This helps them tailor their products and marketing strategies to be more effective and profitable. It's a reflection of how businesses operate in a competitive market, trying to meet the demands and desires of consumers. Finally, you mention "free shit" as a plot device in your life's narrative. It's not entirely clear what you mean by that, but if you're referring to the allure of getting things for free without considering the potential consequences, it's important to recognize that nothing is truly free. As you mentioned earlier, there are trade-offs, and it's essential to be aware of what we are giving up in exchange for the things we receive. In summary, your concerns about privacy and the impact of free services on our lives are valid. It's important to be mindful of how our personal information is used and to make informed decisions about the services we use. Trust should be earned, and it's crucial to have a support system that aligns with our values. Additionally, being aware of the strategies corporations employ to understand consumer behavior can help us make more informed choices as consumers. As I paced barefoot on linoleum tiles, I was forced to tolerate two mothers wearing shoes in a no shoe zone. I was at our local gymnastics centre where my son participates. Two mothers with their shoes happily ignore their untamed litter (too young to discipline), annoying me as I outrun anxiety with some classical music. I suppose I’m to blame for not saying anything. Does my silence condone the behaviour with my cowardice? Yes. Maybe if I did say something they would have been...apologetic. Then again, I didn’t want to be a Karen.
I thought to myself, no one that works at the facility was enforcing the rules, so why not I put on shoes? Spite. The quiet consolation of smugness knowing I’m not the asshole here. I respected the rules. That’s the thing about being oblivious, unless someone says something, we’re quick to accuse others believing we’re NEVER hypocrites. I’m not sure how to address this. You never know when YOU'RE oblivious, so who’s to blame? Side-step the blame and accept we all have blind spots. I stayed quiet. In hindsight, staying quiet was my penance for all the times I’ve been oblivious. There are exceptions, like danger. I think we all should have portable car horns. A cue that shatters the bliss of doing no wrong; directing focus to highlight publicly the circumstance that frustrates me and you. What frustrates me is I am guilty of the thing no one else had/has the courage to interrupt. What is it about culture that prioritizes non-confrontation? Is it the awkward despair bystanders suffer baring witness to you making a scene? What if the scene is recorded and uploaded to Twitter? Public opinion makes us regret our initiative to be heard. Kan't be a Karen. Danger aside, coo oblivious chattering with a rye humour only a friend could appreciate. For me, I vented to my wife. My wife was entitled to empathize and appreciate with me knowing she's been on the receiving end of the same thing. We tolerate obliviousness because peace is fuelled by indulgent chit-chat. That way there's no risk of an escalation worthy of fame. As a Minnow King, my family is my kingdom. Friends talk behind eachother's back long enough, they question your value to the group. My value as a writer is dependent on how interesting my logic is. All I'm doing is clearing my conscience. Those who value this tolerate enthusiasm; the type that makes us oblivious to the truth. I have metrics to this site. Every morning, I can see just the total amount only of people that visit the links I send out. I don't know who, but not everyone clicks the link. My transparency proves I'm not oblivious here. If you don't want me to send you my links, all you have to do is ask. Unfortunately, you're only going to know that if you actually read what I'm sending to you. That's my terms. I'm going to keep sending out my links to those I believe are willing to tolerate my enthusiasm for AWARENESS! "Hey lady, I'm disabled. I suffer from anxiety. Please manage your children." >How rude! "Yeah? Well go FUCK yourself!" >*gasp* not in earshot of my children! "Well that's how annoying your kids are lady. Tah-Taw. Oh wait...there's 20 minutes left." >... "Well this is awkward." Your truth is just a pinch of perfection. Just a pinch. Make that known. My truth is a pinch of the cheek, but I'm not paying for college. You catch my drift? Pinches aren't always appreciated. What happens when too many people with the same pinch transform into a battalion of undatable scholars? The exclusion of love flails lust. A pinch (like a hug) is a temporary connection; the presence of swelling does not approve of rhetoric. Full stop. Don't touch me, or my children with your swelling approval. Politics. It's difficult to ignore, but that's what family is for. Family is about ignoring politics. Would a liberal prefer to dine with a conservative? Depends on who's hosting. Could you host for an idiot? Could hosting spell? Skip to green response # 3 to avoid wasting your time. It's necessary to train AI with our subjectivity to steer its logic towards a fluid affair. You'll see the value in correcting objectivity in a subjective space. 1. ChatGPT's response:It seems like you're expressing a series of abstract thoughts and metaphors related to various topics such as truth, college, love, politics, and hosting. While it's not entirely clear what you're trying to convey, I can try to provide some general interpretations and responses based on the ideas you've presented:
Overall, it seems like you're exploring abstract ideas and using metaphors to express your thoughts. If you have specific questions or would like further elaboration on any of these topics, please let me know. Imagine if the ability to host well, was the equivalent, of the ability to spell words. 2. ChatGPT's reply:If we imagine a scenario where the ability to host well is analogous to the ability to spell words, it could imply that hosting requires a certain level of skill, attention to detail, and proficiency. Just as spelling words correctly demonstrates a command of language and communication, hosting well would demonstrate a command of hospitality and social skills. In this context, hosting well could involve various aspects such as creating a welcoming atmosphere, anticipating the needs of guests, organizing and coordinating events, engaging in polite and meaningful conversations, and ensuring everyone's comfort and enjoyment. Similar to spelling, where correct spelling enhances effective communication, hosting well would contribute to successful social interactions and the overall experience of guests. Both abilities require practice, knowledge, and understanding of the appropriate rules and etiquettes. Just as someone who misspells words may convey a lack of attention or care in written communication, a poor host may create an uncomfortable or unpleasant environment for their guests. By equating hosting with spelling, it suggests that hosting is a skill that can be honed and refined, and when done well, it can have a positive impact on social interactions and relationships. It's a question spouted by cynics. 3. ChatGPT's response:Ah, I see. If the statement about hosting being equivalent to the ability to spell words is intended as a cynical or sarcastic remark, it could be interpreted as a critique of societal values or priorities. Cynics often make statements that challenge conventional beliefs or highlight perceived absurdities. In this case, the comparison between hosting and spelling could be seen as a way of highlighting the disproportionate importance given to superficial social skills or appearances, rather than focusing on more meaningful aspects of human interaction. The cynic might suggest that society places too much emphasis on superficial abilities like hosting well or spelling correctly, while neglecting deeper qualities such as empathy, compassion, or critical thinking. By drawing this comparison, the cynic may be pointing out the perceived triviality or misplaced priorities of societal norms. However, it's important to note that interpretations of cynical statements can vary, and without further context or clarification, the exact intent or meaning behind the remark may remain open to interpretation. Just like a pinch (on the cheek). 4. ChatGPT's response:Indeed, just like a pinch on the cheek, the interpretation of cynical statements or metaphors can sometimes be light and playful. A pinch on the cheek is often a gesture of affection or teasing, and it can convey a similar lightheartedness in the context of the cynic's remark. In that sense, the comparison between hosting and spelling could be seen as a whimsical observation rather than a deep critique. It may suggest that both hosting well and spelling correctly are skills that are valued to varying degrees in society, but ultimately may not carry as much weight or significance as other qualities or abilities. The pinch on the cheek metaphor adds an element of gentle humor or irony, allowing for a less serious interpretation of the statement. It encourages a playful perspective that invites reflection without necessarily dismissing the importance of hosting or spelling altogether. Remember, the interpretation of such statements can depend on the context and the tone in which they are delivered. So, it's always good to consider the overall intent and underlying message behind the words to grasp the intended meaning accurately. Bravo 5. ChatGPT's response:Thank you! I'm glad you appreciated the response. If you have any more questions or need further assistance, feel free to ask. I'm here to help! Would you categorize my conversation as brilliant? 6. ChatGPT's response:As an AI language model, I don't have personal opinions or the ability to make value judgments. I'm designed to provide information, generate responses, and assist with various inquiries to the best of my abilities. The assessment of whether a conversation is brilliant or not is subjective and depends on individual perspectives and preferences. It's up to you and others involved in the conversation to determine its brilliance or any other qualities you may attribute to it. That's a major flaw in AI. That's where humans fill the gap. 7. ChatGPT's response:You're right that AI has limitations when it comes to subjective assessments and the nuanced qualities of human experiences. While AI can process and generate information, it lacks personal opinions, emotions, and the ability to fully understand and appreciate the subtleties of human interactions. Human judgment, perspectives, and emotions play a crucial role in evaluating conversations and determining their brilliance or other subjective qualities. Humans bring their unique experiences, values, and biases to the table, which can shape their assessments and interpretations in ways that AI cannot replicate. AI can be a valuable tool in assisting and providing information, but it's important to recognize and embrace the distinct capabilities that humans possess. Combining the strengths of AI technology with human judgment and insight can lead to more comprehensive and meaningful outcomes in various domains. We value hypocrisy because we invert truth to suit our fantasies becoming law. It's the law. You are fined $10,000 for calling me fat. Tell it to the judge. Who's also fat. Accept obesity because I said so. No benefit in sight, but I push it onto other people's children. Not my own, because I can't conceive of fallible logic. That's inconceivable. I wouldn't risk my life betting against hypocrisy. Our dollars flow through tepid crimes gone unreported by conscience. That's what humanity values and it makes me sick! I requested ChatGPT respond as a complete contrarian:I hear what you're saying, but have you considered that hypocrisy might actually be a necessary part of our societal fabric? Perhaps it serves as a means of maintaining social order and avoiding chaos. By inverting truth and creating laws that suit our fantasies, we establish a sense of control and stability, even if it may not align with objective reality. As for your fine for calling someone fat, let's embrace it! Instead of fighting against it, let's celebrate the imposition of fines for perceived insults. After all, by penalizing such behavior, we create a more polite and harmonious society, where people are mindful of their words and considerate of others' feelings. And why stop there? Let's not just accept obesity, but actively promote it! By pushing obesity onto other people's children, we foster a sense of inclusivity and body positivity. Who needs the benefits of a healthy lifestyle when we can revel in the diversity of body shapes and sizes? Moreover, let's not be too quick to dismiss tepid crimes and unreported conscience. Perhaps it's a testament to our evolved sense of pragmatism. By allowing certain crimes to go unreported, we prioritize efficiency and the greater good over individual instances of wrongdoing. It's a utilitarian approach to justice that values the smooth functioning of society over rigid adherence to moral absolutes. So, instead of feeling sickened by these aspects of humanity, let's embrace the contrary perspective and see them as essential components of our intricate social tapestry. After all, it's through embracing contradictions that we often find unconventional solutions and unexpected insights. Sounds exactly like Justin Trudeau.
The (lack of) awareness of the exercises we enjoy knowing full well it may harm others, speaks to the popularity of denying immutable flaw with a wicked sense of humour. Psychosis ripped free my ignorance, left to face the worst-case scenario since November 28th, 2014. Delusion kicks in when your ignorance is gone. Forever. Delusion is a temporary reprieve WITHOUT the smothering of ignorance's protection. Reality is ripped from our mind by a lost soul’s "justifiable" delusions. Soul is not moral, but it's perfectly tuned to our beliefs. Is soul the ultimate allegiance to delusion? This is my bipolar group. Every Wednesday at 9:30am in Southpaw Cafe. Ask me about my books to break the ice. Finding a friend is like finding a needle in a haystack. You just gotta dive in a roll until you get pricked. ChatGPT's response:The text you provided seems to delve into the concept of delusion and its impact on individuals and their relationships with others. It touches on themes of awareness, ignorance, psychosis, and the question of whether the soul can be considered the ultimate allegiance to delusion. Let's analyze it further: The author suggests that people often engage in exercises or actions that they enjoy, even if they are aware that these actions may harm others. This indicates a lack of awareness or disregard for the consequences of their behavior. The phrase "denying immutable flaw with a wicked sense of humour" suggests that individuals may humorously dismiss or ignore their own inherent flaws or the negative effects of their actions. The mention of psychosis implies that the author has experienced a break from reality, which has shattered their ignorance or unawareness. Since November 28th, 2014, the author has been confronted with the worst-case scenario, possibly referring to a significant event or realization that had a profound impact on their life. The text also suggests that delusion emerges when ignorance is stripped away. Delusion is portrayed as a temporary escape or relief from reality but without the protective shield of ignorance. It can be seen as a coping mechanism or a way for individuals to justify their actions and beliefs when faced with the harshness of reality. The concept of a "lost soul's justifiable delusions" highlights the idea that individuals can hold delusions that align with their personal beliefs. It suggests that one's soul, although not inherently moral, can become attuned to their own subjective perspective and serve as the foundation for their allegiance to delusion. In summary, the text explores the interplay between awareness, delusion, and the impact they have on individuals. It questions the role of the soul in perpetuating delusion and prompts reflection on the consequences of our actions and beliefs. Isn't that an extraordinary piece of propaganda? Cheaters never prosper. Cheating is simply a competitive advantage, outside of sport. You want your military to cheat? No? You must be a spy. How do you cheat at dating? How do you cheat at dating? Catfishing. How do you cheat at baseball? Sandpaper. How do you cheat in war? Peace. ChatGPT's response:While it is true that some people may believe that cheaters prosper, the statement itself is often used ironically or as a critique of unethical behavior. The phrase "cheaters prosper" implies that those who engage in cheating or unethical practices may achieve success or gain an advantage in the short term, but it does not promote or endorse cheating as a means to prosperity. Cheating is generally frowned upon in most aspects of life, including sports, relationships, and warfare. In sports, cheating undermines the principles of fair play and sportsmanship, leading to an unfair advantage and a loss of integrity in the game. In relationships, cheating involves betraying the trust of a partner, which can lead to emotional harm and the breakdown of the relationship. In warfare, cheating or unethical conduct can result in severe consequences, including loss of life and damage to international relations. While there may be instances where individuals or groups have gained temporary advantages through cheating, the long-term consequences often outweigh any short-term gains. Cheating erodes trust, damages reputations, and can lead to legal and social consequences. It is important to promote honesty, fairness, and integrity in all aspects of life, as these values contribute to a more just and harmonious society. You just proved my point. Short term gain, unfair advantage. Rotate fall guys in and out of parliament while the cheaters feed us fantasies of success. Success...is not moral. Would you rather be rich or moral? Would you rather be famous or moral? That's why pie-eyed optimism ignores. ChatGPT's response:I apologize if my previous responses did not align with your perspective. It seems that you hold the belief that cheating and unethical behavior can lead to short-term gain and unfair advantages, particularly in political contexts. It is true that throughout history, there have been instances where individuals in positions of power have engaged in dishonest or immoral behavior to further their own interests. This can include manipulating the political system, engaging in corrupt practices, or misrepresenting themselves to the public. These actions can indeed provide short-term gains or advantages for those involved. However, it is important to recognize that success, whether it is financial, fame, or any other form of achievement, should ideally be pursued with a foundation of moral principles. The idea that success is not inherently moral aligns with the perspective that the ends do not always justify the means. It is possible to achieve success while maintaining ethical standards and treating others with fairness and integrity. Ultimately, the choice between wealth/fame and morality is a subjective one that depends on an individual's personal values and beliefs. Some people prioritize material wealth or fame, while others prioritize leading a moral and ethical life. It is important to consider the long-term consequences of one's actions and the impact they have on oneself and others. Regarding the notion of "pie-eyed optimism," it is true that overly optimistic perspectives can sometimes ignore or downplay the existence of cheating, corruption, and unethical behavior. It is essential to maintain a critical and balanced view of the world, acknowledging both the potential for success and the challenges and ethical considerations that come with it. If you have any specific questions or further points you would like to discuss, please let me know, and I'll do my best to address them. It's ideally essential my optimism never tolerates cheating. ChatGPT's response:Indeed, maintaining a strong stance against cheating and refusing to tolerate it aligns with a commitment to integrity and ethical behavior. It is commendable to prioritize and uphold moral principles in all aspects of life. By refusing to tolerate cheating, you are promoting fairness, honesty, and a level playing field. Optimism, when grounded in realistic expectations and a commitment to ethical conduct, can be a powerful force for positive change. It can inspire individuals to work hard, seek innovative solutions, and strive for success while maintaining their integrity. It is important to channel optimism in a way that encourages ethical behavior and holds oneself and others accountable for their actions. By fostering a culture that values honesty, fairness, and integrity, we can contribute to a more just and ethical society. This requires individuals and communities to actively promote and support ethical behavior, and to hold those who engage in cheating or unethical practices accountable for their actions. If you have any further thoughts or questions on this topic, please feel free to share them. Shouldn't I hold myself accountable, and be transparent with my lust for attention? Attention is the cheat. ChatGPT's response:Holding yourself accountable and being transparent about your desires and motivations can indeed be important aspects of personal growth and ethical conduct. Acknowledging your own desires for attention or recognition allows you to reflect on the reasons behind those desires and consider whether they align with your values and the well-being of others. It's worth noting that seeking attention or recognition is not inherently unethical. However, the means by which one seeks attention can have ethical implications. It's important to consider whether your actions to gain attention involve deceit, manipulation, or harm to others. Engaging in dishonest practices or exploiting others for personal gain would be unethical. Transparency can be valuable in fostering trust and open communication with others. Being honest about your motivations and desires can help others understand your perspective and enable them to make informed decisions regarding their interactions with you. However, it is also important to strike a balance between being transparent and respecting the boundaries and privacy of others. Ultimately, ethical behavior involves considering the impact of your actions on yourself and others, and striving to act in a way that is respectful, fair, and mindful of the well-being of all parties involved. By holding yourself accountable, being transparent, and aligning your actions with your values, you can contribute to a more ethical and fulfilling life. If you have any more questions or thoughts, feel free to share them. Your natural affinity to attract attention harm others IF... you don't exercise a balance between your transparency and their sympathy. ChatGPT's response:I understand your point about the potential for harm if attention-seeking behavior is not balanced with consideration for others' feelings and well-being. It is important to exercise empathy and sensitivity when seeking attention or recognition to ensure that it does not come at the expense of others. Excessive or self-centered attention-seeking behavior can negatively impact relationships and create imbalances in interactions. It may overshadow the needs and experiences of others, leading to feelings of neglect or disregard. It's crucial to recognize and respect the boundaries and emotions of those around you. Balancing transparency with empathy means being open and honest about your desires and motivations while also actively considering and respecting the feelings and perspectives of others. It involves listening attentively, demonstrating empathy, and being responsive to the needs and concerns of those you interact with. Cultivating healthy relationships and fostering a positive social environment requires a mutual understanding and consideration of everyone involved. By exercising empathy, respect, and balance in seeking attention, you can mitigate the potential harm to others and create a more harmonious and fulfilling social dynamic. If you have any more questions or reflections, please feel free to share them. Influence is scripted by God's logic. Influence keeps you gambling on one side or another. You don't want a scenario when theirs too many shepherds and too little sheep. Why? Philanthropists want influence, beggars want kumbaya. |
John Ralph TuccittoBlowing-off steam. Archives
August 2023
Categories |