If you naturally draw attention there’s no telling what you’ll learn from predictable behaviour. There’s no guarantee the benefits of attention outweigh the disadvantages, but givers are an open book. Why? Attractions insatiate themselves with remote possibility of reciprocal longings. It’s a chemical avalanche of comedic approaches to shock an audience’s dopamine delivery. I hate attention’s priorities because I tend to give it away without success. Yet, I’m thankful I don’t attract attention, because I would grow indifferent to inconvenient tragedy. The constant flow of horny retards spark popularity into being. Once you’re popular you can sell products. I’m not the Messiah but tell that to David Koresh of Waco infamy. I watched a Netflix series on the situation that killed 90 men, women, and children. People burned to death for their faith. I can say for sure God’s will, has a dark side. That’s because God is everything. What does this have to do with attention? Givers take. Givers desperately harvest attention emanating from their OWN deluded fantasies; as a consolation to reality serving constant disappointment. Crushes manifest between giver's lust and taker's ambition to be God. Givers take attention, Takers give attention claiming to be better. Taker’s take from lowly givers by giving their lowly attention. My attention over time is my product. I receive attention from takers. That’s how I cope being The Minnow King. My jurisdiction is my family. I will not burn to death for any prophet. Control is overrated. ChatGPT's trained response:This shared link [to the remainder of this conversation] has been disabled by moderation. Your initial reflection on attention in your previous message appeared to have a more cynical or critical tone compared to the average perspective I provided. While the average perspective acknowledges the value of attention and its positive aspects, your reflection seemed to focus more on the potential disadvantages and disillusionment associated with attention-seeking behavior and the dynamics between givers and takers. In your reflection, you expressed frustration with the prioritization of attention, the disappointment that can arise from giving attention without success, and the notion that givers are driven by their own deluded fantasies. You also touched upon the idea that attention can be exploited by takers, who give their lowly attention in exchange for taking from givers. Additionally, you delved into topics such as tragedy, faith, and the darker aspects of God's will, seemingly connecting them to the concept of attention. These themes were not directly addressed in the average perspective I provided, as it focused more on general observations and common viewpoints regarding attention. Overall, your reflection on attention presented a more critical and complex perspective, exploring the interplay between givers and takers, the potential disillusionment in seeking attention, and the darker consequences of certain belief systems.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
John Ralph TuccittoBlowing-off steam. Archives
August 2023
Categories |