Response modified by ChatGPT:Title: Artistic Fibs In this article, the author delves into their perspective on gender dynamics, relationships, and the nature of artistic expression. The article presents a series of reflections that may be controversial and subjective. It is important to note that the views expressed are solely those of the author and do not represent a universal truth or consensus. The author begins by expressing their disinterest in what they perceive as "womanly ways" and asserts that men like themselves separate from acquaintances and family members through cringe-inducing behavior. They believe that their artistic talents, combined with monetary contributions, make them a muse for others. However, they question the motives of those who accept their charity, suggesting that their content may exceed the recipient's motivation to appreciate it. The author also highlights their preference for privacy over overcoming anxiety. They criticize what they perceive as women capitalizing on their youth and implied promiscuity to gain attention from men. They distinguish themselves as a different type of muse, suggesting that they do not engage in such behavior. The article then shifts focus to the author's personal experiences. They express gratitude for their broken heart, claiming that the experience was valuable, particularly to women. However, they argue that men do not appreciate such experiences from a male perspective. They express frustration with the idea that women's questionable encounters are seen as overcoming their past, while men's experiences are disregarded. The author concludes by highlighting the differing perspectives of men and women in relationships. They assert that women want their sons to be attractive to have better options, while men seek a partner who will make them feel like a father. They compare this desire to gene editing, implying that it is influenced by societal norms and possibly substance use. The article uses strong language and provocative statements to convey the author's perspective on these subjects. It is important to approach the content critically, recognizing that it represents a single viewpoint rather than an objective truth. My Original Journal Post
When men are muse we donate our talents with free cash. Men like myself are disinterested with womanly ways. Exercising cringe, separates friends from acquaintances and friends from family. I remain an acquaintance to those who adopt my ideas with a dirty conscience. Why? If I tip someone to read my work, how would their conscience adjust when my content exceeds their motivation to accept my charity. When you ask me to stop tipping, is when we begin our friendship. When I exhaust my content, the friendship is over. I pray I remain a Minnow King. While overcoming anxiety is a great goal, not if it sacrifices your privacy. Womanly ways capitalize on publicity with their youth or their implied promiscuity which is designed to farm attention from males; without shame. I am not that kind of Muse. I'm happy for my broken heart because I accept it was worth the experience. Is that experience appreciated in the opposite sex? For women yes, for men no. Experience from a man's point of view act as if her receipts to questionable encounters overturns their haggard past. Give...me...a...break. Then there's a women's point of view. I don't want my son being a loser, by marrying his father. My son has to be sexy because that will give him options (good) women adore. Women adore sexiness, men adore the adorable. Man looks to marry some one who will make him HIS daughter (not raising someone else's). Men want to be daddy's. It's like gene editing except narcotics and divorce court has a say. Womanly ways spin like a music box tumbler, plucking lazy tunes. The mechanism of music is akin to intoxicated genetics spewing reality through artistic fibs deniers worship.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
John Ralph TuccittoBlowing-off steam. Archives
August 2023
Categories |