Gospel of Data
Temptation + Debt = Inflation
Gospel of Data
Temptation + Debt = Inflation
Updated July 25th, 2023 at 11:01pm
Version 1.7.2
Initial your name once (on a blank space) in blue ink if you agree with this manifesto.
Initial your name once (on a blank space) in red ink if you disagree with this manifesto.
Leave room for others.
Bring back grassroot debate to hold ourselves accountable.
I am a bipolar father.
This manifesto tackles the crux of inflation.
The crux of inflaaation is temptaaation.
I'm going to write in BIG BIG letters…to serenade the “independent-baby” within you let down in adulthood. Every maladjusted tick that signals a failure ERUPTS, triggering within a fuckin tsunami of “uninvited” transparency to correct the instinct which offends the innocent and the pretenders. This isolates us through selfishness, fear, shame, denial, and guilt. A predictable reaction. Rebelling against this isolation (instead of introspecting with a journal) will hand evil your autonomy piece by piece until you commit a crime. How did I used to deal with that is to shut my brain down by welcoming the censorship trauma served me. I shut down and I cowered from the hypocrisy of my denial; shamelessly accusing the innocent to deflect from MY guilt believing thoughts alone are illegal. I can tell you now, thoughts alone are not illegal. Then in 2014...I experienced psychosis. What happened when "cosmic chatter" delivered moral failures? I had to accept immutable flaw, constantly. Hypocrisy (of my denial) persuaded my irrationality to openly rant, rave, treading water while chumming the shark tank with period blood.
I wrote 9 books and published 4 websites documenting my path to recovery; but the damage was done long before I knew better. I conquered psychosis with the radiance of a toothless smile. Took me 8.5 years…but now I don't fear flaw. Immutable flaw. EVERYTHING is linked to...to what mankind denies. An instinctual level. A primal directive mankind obeys publicly, but otherwise cannot ignore. I conquered that flaw with contemplation, discipline, and patience. I will do the same with my understanding of “Inflation.” I'm going to do the same thing I did with psychosis: pursue evil with a smile. Why the smile? Evil hates courage. HAAAAAAHAHAHA!
I wrote 9 books and published 4 websites documenting my path to recovery; but the damage was done long before I knew better. I conquered psychosis with the radiance of a toothless smile. Took me 8.5 years…but now I don't fear flaw. Immutable flaw. EVERYTHING is linked to...to what mankind denies. An instinctual level. A primal directive mankind obeys publicly, but otherwise cannot ignore. I conquered that flaw with contemplation, discipline, and patience. I will do the same with my understanding of “Inflation.” I'm going to do the same thing I did with psychosis: pursue evil with a smile. Why the smile? Evil hates courage. HAAAAAAHAHAHA!
1. Government CRAVES Convenience
Can you blame them? They’re crooks YOU vetted to rob your detractors of their sanity. Look at the link between CBDCs and policing “fringe” activism (i.e., freezing Canadian bank accounts of Freedom Convoy participants in Ottawa 2022). Data mining is approved by accepting legalese the public doesn’t bother to read or understand. Transparency is a shock…at first; just like a firewall revealing all real-time incoming and outgoing network traffic (at idle). I would want to uninstall it immediately because it’s too transparent. You own nothing in the west if you value privacy. If government was transparent, it would educate voters to the realities of running a nation. Who doesn’t want that? Lazy people. Otherwise, they would prefer to survive in the wilderness.
Politics is just a “corporately branded tribalism” or an education into the predictable manipulation of citizen's denial who despite their wealth cannot accept themselves at the best of times. Like riding a rollercoaster without the concern of death, media monologues the spectrum of your insecurity through the perfection YOU crave because of vanity. It’s profitable because temptaaation is consistently predictable. It’s a progressive crutch to support lonely broken souls till death do us part. Transparency forces you to read the contracts you’ve ignored. Repeatedly. Too many people depend on government to survive because their children’s children were born in the nest government built with bank’s money. A country is a corporation. The economy is payroll. Value is documented with paper for trade amongst people who lack a trade to barter with. There’s only so much land to farm and ocean to fish, the rest speculates and prostitutes. You can’t eat paper. top-down actors advertise “currency” to persuade branded tribalism who shall ever manipulate mass denial best…must do so with top-down paternity. The debt we approve is balanced with the meagre consolation of enjoying political trends and cultures serving your narrative.
Government builds an “apparatus” with policy and law to document voter data, to remain in power. Try reading Chinese without a translation. Your LACK of privacy is the translation government needs to decipher the market where meddlers frolic with pie-eyed hopes of fame and fortune. I mean, politicians are crooks. Might as well bully the blind spots of their fans delivering disappointment onto burgeoning triumphs instead of wallowing in pettiness. Do professional victims wallow in an ORGY of pity? Then they deserve their twisted isolation; temptaaation can’t inspire their recovery because losers whore themselves with an immoral empathy called ‘Dearth.’ Pity is their penance. Bullies are weak fathers who build BIGGER government. Does government crave opportunity? Yes. How is that done? Painting masculinity as toxic with unhinged “isms” so when women have an “opportunity” (to divorce) it secures female loyalty. Women are government sleeper-agents that conceive “opportunity” with consensual sexuality (i.e., abortions prioritize women being in constant heat to quench thirsts). That’s why women should choose to not vote because power corrupts their sacred womb. Women should aspire to be sacred, but…rebellion against patriarchy trumps reason. Wanna know why? Keep reading.
Sons are left perturbed by their father advertising his clean conscience with pride. Oh-wait, did TV raise you? Then comedic goofs like Al Bundy, Homer Simpson successfully popularized critiques of husbands amongst impressionable boys and girls. Think of every sitcom father. Cosby was the outlier, but in the end that reputation denied choice women their sanctity. Immutable flaw…worms its way through a STONKING intrigue alluring innocence with a rebellious curiosity. It’s a courtship that naturally disintegrates biological bonds (i.e., fathers and brides). That courtship between awareness and innocence attracts an ironic ire from biological fathers. Grandchildren, or no dice. How can dads compare? Does government want your daughter to have as many abortions as she wants? The daddy SHE never had, while you preach your patriarchy. LOL. Good fuckin luck.
Government is a sugar daddy (i.e., power corrupts women’s sacred womb). Why ruin a good thing with “transparency?” That is until ladies hit the wall at 30 and their looks can no longer support the carrousel of rebellion distracting themselves from motherhood; just to succeed a man at his own game. Don’t worry, bank sponsored “isms” to the rescue. Why propagandize to voters believing the value of diverse community? Diversity divides with prejudice towards the majority’s pest which I admit are straight, white, men. Feminists prefer variety, just like the men that won’t marry them. It stimulates activity to destabilize government as a weapon (i.e., saturating nationalities with illegal migrant males to impregnate the undesirables). It’s amplifying behaviour to expose more data by outspoken casts experiencing friction (i.e., straight, white, men agitating with facts). “Opportunity” sees nothing wrong with colour; profit is a diverse gospel of greed and data. Does government want opportunity? Do voter’s want opportunity? If yes, give away your freedom, and watch your lack of privacy MONETIZE your lifestyle without skills to survive in the wild. Privacy doesn’t pay for your free bread sugar-tits.
Losing an election means other people’s preferences openly harass YOU at will. If it doesn’t work, kill, and/or imprison the fall-guy. Trump is the fall guy that keeps coming back for more. He’s on “your” side, whether you like it or not. Fall guys are groomed by ego. Look at Justin Trudeau. What holds him accountable I’m POSITIVE he denies it. Immutable flaw. I published books and websites about immutable flaw. Who has the cleaner conscience here? Conscience alone is never moral. Neither is convenience, yet government mines YOUR data with “free” bread in exchange to forgive government when they fuck up and validate conspiracy theorists. Deny, deny, deny. Comply, comply. Sigh. How does one build an economy from this DESPICABLE apparatus, let alone the reality it plagues with inaccuracies. How do you make a good economy let alone track it? Steer labour with lethargic intellectualism? Anchor flaws to sound bites? Design policy that holds voters accountable? Nah, transparency SCARES voters when it’s aimed at them. Look at the “citizens” that supported Hitler’s honesty. Your enemies will document your history with their truth, not your honesty.
It’s important you understand my views on denial to help link temptaaation to inflaaation. Does the rhyme suggest a truth?
Can you blame them? They’re crooks YOU vetted to rob your detractors of their sanity. Look at the link between CBDCs and policing “fringe” activism (i.e., freezing Canadian bank accounts of Freedom Convoy participants in Ottawa 2022). Data mining is approved by accepting legalese the public doesn’t bother to read or understand. Transparency is a shock…at first; just like a firewall revealing all real-time incoming and outgoing network traffic (at idle). I would want to uninstall it immediately because it’s too transparent. You own nothing in the west if you value privacy. If government was transparent, it would educate voters to the realities of running a nation. Who doesn’t want that? Lazy people. Otherwise, they would prefer to survive in the wilderness.
Politics is just a “corporately branded tribalism” or an education into the predictable manipulation of citizen's denial who despite their wealth cannot accept themselves at the best of times. Like riding a rollercoaster without the concern of death, media monologues the spectrum of your insecurity through the perfection YOU crave because of vanity. It’s profitable because temptaaation is consistently predictable. It’s a progressive crutch to support lonely broken souls till death do us part. Transparency forces you to read the contracts you’ve ignored. Repeatedly. Too many people depend on government to survive because their children’s children were born in the nest government built with bank’s money. A country is a corporation. The economy is payroll. Value is documented with paper for trade amongst people who lack a trade to barter with. There’s only so much land to farm and ocean to fish, the rest speculates and prostitutes. You can’t eat paper. top-down actors advertise “currency” to persuade branded tribalism who shall ever manipulate mass denial best…must do so with top-down paternity. The debt we approve is balanced with the meagre consolation of enjoying political trends and cultures serving your narrative.
Government builds an “apparatus” with policy and law to document voter data, to remain in power. Try reading Chinese without a translation. Your LACK of privacy is the translation government needs to decipher the market where meddlers frolic with pie-eyed hopes of fame and fortune. I mean, politicians are crooks. Might as well bully the blind spots of their fans delivering disappointment onto burgeoning triumphs instead of wallowing in pettiness. Do professional victims wallow in an ORGY of pity? Then they deserve their twisted isolation; temptaaation can’t inspire their recovery because losers whore themselves with an immoral empathy called ‘Dearth.’ Pity is their penance. Bullies are weak fathers who build BIGGER government. Does government crave opportunity? Yes. How is that done? Painting masculinity as toxic with unhinged “isms” so when women have an “opportunity” (to divorce) it secures female loyalty. Women are government sleeper-agents that conceive “opportunity” with consensual sexuality (i.e., abortions prioritize women being in constant heat to quench thirsts). That’s why women should choose to not vote because power corrupts their sacred womb. Women should aspire to be sacred, but…rebellion against patriarchy trumps reason. Wanna know why? Keep reading.
Sons are left perturbed by their father advertising his clean conscience with pride. Oh-wait, did TV raise you? Then comedic goofs like Al Bundy, Homer Simpson successfully popularized critiques of husbands amongst impressionable boys and girls. Think of every sitcom father. Cosby was the outlier, but in the end that reputation denied choice women their sanctity. Immutable flaw…worms its way through a STONKING intrigue alluring innocence with a rebellious curiosity. It’s a courtship that naturally disintegrates biological bonds (i.e., fathers and brides). That courtship between awareness and innocence attracts an ironic ire from biological fathers. Grandchildren, or no dice. How can dads compare? Does government want your daughter to have as many abortions as she wants? The daddy SHE never had, while you preach your patriarchy. LOL. Good fuckin luck.
Government is a sugar daddy (i.e., power corrupts women’s sacred womb). Why ruin a good thing with “transparency?” That is until ladies hit the wall at 30 and their looks can no longer support the carrousel of rebellion distracting themselves from motherhood; just to succeed a man at his own game. Don’t worry, bank sponsored “isms” to the rescue. Why propagandize to voters believing the value of diverse community? Diversity divides with prejudice towards the majority’s pest which I admit are straight, white, men. Feminists prefer variety, just like the men that won’t marry them. It stimulates activity to destabilize government as a weapon (i.e., saturating nationalities with illegal migrant males to impregnate the undesirables). It’s amplifying behaviour to expose more data by outspoken casts experiencing friction (i.e., straight, white, men agitating with facts). “Opportunity” sees nothing wrong with colour; profit is a diverse gospel of greed and data. Does government want opportunity? Do voter’s want opportunity? If yes, give away your freedom, and watch your lack of privacy MONETIZE your lifestyle without skills to survive in the wild. Privacy doesn’t pay for your free bread sugar-tits.
Losing an election means other people’s preferences openly harass YOU at will. If it doesn’t work, kill, and/or imprison the fall-guy. Trump is the fall guy that keeps coming back for more. He’s on “your” side, whether you like it or not. Fall guys are groomed by ego. Look at Justin Trudeau. What holds him accountable I’m POSITIVE he denies it. Immutable flaw. I published books and websites about immutable flaw. Who has the cleaner conscience here? Conscience alone is never moral. Neither is convenience, yet government mines YOUR data with “free” bread in exchange to forgive government when they fuck up and validate conspiracy theorists. Deny, deny, deny. Comply, comply. Sigh. How does one build an economy from this DESPICABLE apparatus, let alone the reality it plagues with inaccuracies. How do you make a good economy let alone track it? Steer labour with lethargic intellectualism? Anchor flaws to sound bites? Design policy that holds voters accountable? Nah, transparency SCARES voters when it’s aimed at them. Look at the “citizens” that supported Hitler’s honesty. Your enemies will document your history with their truth, not your honesty.
It’s important you understand my views on denial to help link temptaaation to inflaaation. Does the rhyme suggest a truth?
2. Power Play
There are two types of blackmail I can think of: Theft, and Initiation. This is my opinion. Government can’t have a crisis of conscience. Well…they can, but there’s little they can do to redeem themselves. No one, and I mean no one…has a squeaky-clean past. I promise you, I’m not Jesus. Honest. Yet, perfection is the standard the buying public criticizes with. An idiotic standard like this deserves to be exploited by savvy monologues. Like this one. How I clean my conscience is to be 100% honest with myself. How can I be transparent enough to convince others I’m not worth investigating? If truth convicts flaw, silence is the only way to avoid arrest, hence the shame we deflect. Why sabotage yourself to help the CROOKS you elected? Here’s the thing, honesty is NOT truth. It’s like when professional athletes are asked if they take steroids. They always reply “no.” Athletes are honest, but not truthful. The truth is, they are on OTHER performance enhancing drugs which are technically not steroids. This avoids the “spirit…” of the accusation as the buying public’s precious innocence has very LITTLE tolerance for cheating. Who fucking cares! Sport is entertainment, morons. Don’t look up to these people if YOU refuse to ACCEPT the reality of SPORT. That’s how athletes sleep like babies. I sleep like a baby because I’m not an evangelist. Die with your stupid ideas. That’s what I’m doing.
Doping enhances sport. Now think of politics as doping. How do politicians’ dope? Honesty, not truth. Don’t look up to these people if YOU refuse to accept the reality of running a country (without enough data). What’s the reality of running a country? In my opinion, conscience alone is not moral. Accusers approaching accountability from a moral house of cards wields a conscience that is only cleaned exclusively by inconvenient truth, not honesty. However, the supporter’s conscience is cleaned only by honesty, not inconvenient truth. The truth…is lazy people are never held accountable because it hurts their fragile esteem. Spectators outnumber those in play. Those with power are in a position to tell the inconvenient truth, but that holds bullies I-I-mean voters accountable. Not feasible. Why? Who voted for that lying crook? Spectators. Do lazy people want to be held accountable? That’s why BACKLASH is a desperate SURGE of denial hoping to escape when the REALITY of immutable flaw delivers transparently inconvenient truths so fucking HARD the guilt alone has you needlessly fearing the “apparatus” with guilt. Thoughts alone are not illegal. Those with power must “dope” to protect voters from their own fragile truths succumbing to Darwinism (i.e., coddling fragile truths is a political platform). Truth blackmails with honesty. The solution? Tell the truth or bankrupt your fan’s conscience with a collapsing dictatorship (i.e., Trudeau making vaccine mandates a campaign promise). My conscience is not yours, that’s why you CAN be blackmailed: one’s incentive to corrupt corrupts how we dwell. Politicians dope to PROTECT voters from themselves. Dear Lord. Now compromise these politicians through theft or initiation. Theft is obvious, but what about initiation? The initiation is to be exposed to immutable flaw and ACCEPT immutable flaw through INITIATING crime. Blackmail secures artificial loyalty to comprehend and confirm stooges understand their (family’s) life is at stake if they fuck up. Family is a prerequisite for blackmail. Those that are initiated accept the risks can be mitigated through biased PR. In other wards mainstream media and partisan agencies.
Power comes with the responsibility to never deviate with/from your spectators. The truth will only inform the collective to potentially revolt if truth is free to solution uninhibited. That’s why we have “accusers” or Conspiracy Theorists. Like me. If government compromises the collective with their honesty…they secure a house of cards to blossom belief investigation is NOT necessary (i.e., Hunter Biden’s laptop). “No one is perfect, so don’t be a hypocrite guy…” In this very specific way. A way libtards need to survive beggars belief.
“I believe climate change can be addressed through a carbon tax.”
That’s honesty at work because what Trudeau is not telling you is for his lazy voter’s sake. Get it? If a Conservative PM banned electric vehicles because of its factually MASSIVE carbon and ethical footprint…wouldn’t that be an ironic twist to a progressive policy? Still want CBDCs disabling dissidents? I didn’t think so. The truth is electrification without a clean manufacturing and fuel source pollutes. It may be the future, but right now, I don’t see the bright side of your fantasies bankrupting the ecosystem along the way. Eventually you’ll be right, but it’s not of this time. If Pierre Poilievre banned bank accounts on those grounds, I’d protest alongside Lefties! Censorship to that degree is fucking beyond despicable, no matter how you slice it.
The truth has you infinitesimally accept a midget’s speck of immutable flaw, briefly. That predictable nature you advertise online advertises predictions how to profit from the nation’s mass denial. Again…what is this immutable flaw? Doesn’t matter, just know this curse is the human condition to survive innocence, ignorance, lies, truths, deceits, egos, distractions, indulgences, depression, work, boredom, affairs, consumption, addiction, hunger, rivalry and inflaaation. Don’t you see the pattern? If it’s difficult to accept inconvenient truth, it’s because you’re not the first to lead the charge with foresight and fundraising. That’s the cocoon of immutable flaw, the backhanded weapon of perception. Because you can’t conceive you are your own worst enemy, your crimes are never convicted if you do as the blackmailers say. Or…conceive. Conceive every moment of the day your worst denial represents temptaaation’s unfortunate grip on our flaws. Intrusive thoughts can’t be controlled, but actions can. Accept immutable flaw to excel at citizenry.
Blackmail makes sense. It secures an artificial loyalty that can be manipulated by (in)convenient sources that subscribe to honesty/truth. Truth is blackmailing with honesty to save fragile egos from themselves. Broken egos want truth. Blackmail PREVENTS the damaging of data downstream of audits. Incentives drive adoption. Rebates. Rebates. Rebates. Egos want honesty, while the humbled crave truth. Both sides of the isle have deal-breakers that contradict the ecosystem. Blackmail the spectators with “incentives.” Con-ve-nience. “Hey…not enough time on your hands to counter-protest? Vote for us, we’ll make those nasty truthers stew in their hate.
“Is humanity a race of pedophiles?”
“No.”
See the difference? Technically, we are not. That’s honesty but it’s not truthful.
There are two types of blackmail I can think of: Theft, and Initiation. This is my opinion. Government can’t have a crisis of conscience. Well…they can, but there’s little they can do to redeem themselves. No one, and I mean no one…has a squeaky-clean past. I promise you, I’m not Jesus. Honest. Yet, perfection is the standard the buying public criticizes with. An idiotic standard like this deserves to be exploited by savvy monologues. Like this one. How I clean my conscience is to be 100% honest with myself. How can I be transparent enough to convince others I’m not worth investigating? If truth convicts flaw, silence is the only way to avoid arrest, hence the shame we deflect. Why sabotage yourself to help the CROOKS you elected? Here’s the thing, honesty is NOT truth. It’s like when professional athletes are asked if they take steroids. They always reply “no.” Athletes are honest, but not truthful. The truth is, they are on OTHER performance enhancing drugs which are technically not steroids. This avoids the “spirit…” of the accusation as the buying public’s precious innocence has very LITTLE tolerance for cheating. Who fucking cares! Sport is entertainment, morons. Don’t look up to these people if YOU refuse to ACCEPT the reality of SPORT. That’s how athletes sleep like babies. I sleep like a baby because I’m not an evangelist. Die with your stupid ideas. That’s what I’m doing.
Doping enhances sport. Now think of politics as doping. How do politicians’ dope? Honesty, not truth. Don’t look up to these people if YOU refuse to accept the reality of running a country (without enough data). What’s the reality of running a country? In my opinion, conscience alone is not moral. Accusers approaching accountability from a moral house of cards wields a conscience that is only cleaned exclusively by inconvenient truth, not honesty. However, the supporter’s conscience is cleaned only by honesty, not inconvenient truth. The truth…is lazy people are never held accountable because it hurts their fragile esteem. Spectators outnumber those in play. Those with power are in a position to tell the inconvenient truth, but that holds bullies I-I-mean voters accountable. Not feasible. Why? Who voted for that lying crook? Spectators. Do lazy people want to be held accountable? That’s why BACKLASH is a desperate SURGE of denial hoping to escape when the REALITY of immutable flaw delivers transparently inconvenient truths so fucking HARD the guilt alone has you needlessly fearing the “apparatus” with guilt. Thoughts alone are not illegal. Those with power must “dope” to protect voters from their own fragile truths succumbing to Darwinism (i.e., coddling fragile truths is a political platform). Truth blackmails with honesty. The solution? Tell the truth or bankrupt your fan’s conscience with a collapsing dictatorship (i.e., Trudeau making vaccine mandates a campaign promise). My conscience is not yours, that’s why you CAN be blackmailed: one’s incentive to corrupt corrupts how we dwell. Politicians dope to PROTECT voters from themselves. Dear Lord. Now compromise these politicians through theft or initiation. Theft is obvious, but what about initiation? The initiation is to be exposed to immutable flaw and ACCEPT immutable flaw through INITIATING crime. Blackmail secures artificial loyalty to comprehend and confirm stooges understand their (family’s) life is at stake if they fuck up. Family is a prerequisite for blackmail. Those that are initiated accept the risks can be mitigated through biased PR. In other wards mainstream media and partisan agencies.
Power comes with the responsibility to never deviate with/from your spectators. The truth will only inform the collective to potentially revolt if truth is free to solution uninhibited. That’s why we have “accusers” or Conspiracy Theorists. Like me. If government compromises the collective with their honesty…they secure a house of cards to blossom belief investigation is NOT necessary (i.e., Hunter Biden’s laptop). “No one is perfect, so don’t be a hypocrite guy…” In this very specific way. A way libtards need to survive beggars belief.
“I believe climate change can be addressed through a carbon tax.”
That’s honesty at work because what Trudeau is not telling you is for his lazy voter’s sake. Get it? If a Conservative PM banned electric vehicles because of its factually MASSIVE carbon and ethical footprint…wouldn’t that be an ironic twist to a progressive policy? Still want CBDCs disabling dissidents? I didn’t think so. The truth is electrification without a clean manufacturing and fuel source pollutes. It may be the future, but right now, I don’t see the bright side of your fantasies bankrupting the ecosystem along the way. Eventually you’ll be right, but it’s not of this time. If Pierre Poilievre banned bank accounts on those grounds, I’d protest alongside Lefties! Censorship to that degree is fucking beyond despicable, no matter how you slice it.
The truth has you infinitesimally accept a midget’s speck of immutable flaw, briefly. That predictable nature you advertise online advertises predictions how to profit from the nation’s mass denial. Again…what is this immutable flaw? Doesn’t matter, just know this curse is the human condition to survive innocence, ignorance, lies, truths, deceits, egos, distractions, indulgences, depression, work, boredom, affairs, consumption, addiction, hunger, rivalry and inflaaation. Don’t you see the pattern? If it’s difficult to accept inconvenient truth, it’s because you’re not the first to lead the charge with foresight and fundraising. That’s the cocoon of immutable flaw, the backhanded weapon of perception. Because you can’t conceive you are your own worst enemy, your crimes are never convicted if you do as the blackmailers say. Or…conceive. Conceive every moment of the day your worst denial represents temptaaation’s unfortunate grip on our flaws. Intrusive thoughts can’t be controlled, but actions can. Accept immutable flaw to excel at citizenry.
Blackmail makes sense. It secures an artificial loyalty that can be manipulated by (in)convenient sources that subscribe to honesty/truth. Truth is blackmailing with honesty to save fragile egos from themselves. Broken egos want truth. Blackmail PREVENTS the damaging of data downstream of audits. Incentives drive adoption. Rebates. Rebates. Rebates. Egos want honesty, while the humbled crave truth. Both sides of the isle have deal-breakers that contradict the ecosystem. Blackmail the spectators with “incentives.” Con-ve-nience. “Hey…not enough time on your hands to counter-protest? Vote for us, we’ll make those nasty truthers stew in their hate.
“Is humanity a race of pedophiles?”
“No.”
See the difference? Technically, we are not. That’s honesty but it’s not truthful.
Google "Shabara"
3. The Manure of Preferences
You are so fucking wrong it makes me question God’s choices with blasphemy. By holding the spectators accountable we produce consensual data. Mandatory voting would incentivize grassroots politics to preach consent. That is where data can be exchanged with considerably transparency without resorting to betting behind blind spots for/against the genuine reactions of denial being exposed on camera without blackmail installed as insurance. Voters MUST be held accountable. Mandatory public voting. It would INVERT the consciousness (right side up) to build backbone. So, what happens if I don’t vote? You are automatically signed up to run for office, where people can vote for YOU, a grassroots spectator turning pro. “Fuck libtards…vote for me!” “Fuck Trump…vote for me!” Which would be your slogan next election? “Oh, I don’t vote.” Yeah? Then I guess you’ll do better as a candidate. Gotcha! Guess what…I’m a liberal. I voted for Trudeau in 2015, but I never re-elected him. I know from experience the consequence of my actions influencing the community I share. Wouldn’t this divide people even more? Inconvenient truth divides cowards with their sponsored ‘isms. Eradicate fear/desire of immutable flaw. Accept this is the alien perspective of humanity I have, thanks to psychosis. Have you been through psychosis? If not, what the fuck do you know about denial? I do what it takes to be a good citizen (like journaling). That’s my preference. Can a $2 goldfish have preferences? Will those preferences be satisfied if it’s a nuisance to you? Welcome to parliament rookie!
Preferences has this immutable quality where it’s an acceptable answer to anything. Why? You can connect the dots. Preferences are the core curve for political clout. At rest, preferences roadmap our fucking soul.
“I prefer rich men. A Queen needs her war chest.”
Do rich men prefer you? Well…they’ll fuck you, impregnate you, but not marry. What’s that inconvenient truth forcing the news to distract you from? Faaacts. Facts that happen to discriminate because preference is not a science, it’s a subjective requirement. Why? Preferences care about exercising choice. Facts care about the consequence of exercising choice. You stop inflation by discriminating AGAINST preferences. How? Grassroots politics speaking inconvenient truths legally. Lazy people must allow grassroots politicians to eat their guts with the politician’s conscience, without applause. Why without applause? Keeps you grounded. Family is the prerequisite for blackmail. I couldn’t in good conscience run for office, that’s a job for crooks. My crook. Wait…crooks are philanthropists with my taxes. The spectators must run onto the field or leave the stadium. I say be a grassroots person who introspectively roadmaps their soul through preferences to AVOID temptaaation. Oooooh! What a great metric to gauge the market.
Is it a fact that I’m tempted to <insert primitive impulse> that denies immutable flaw? Circle:
Yes, or no?
Not to get sidetracked, but temptaaation is the manure of preferences. Do you deny that? I’m a Minnow King, I’m a fish swimming in a jug of your phlegm. I’m just trying to make a friend. I am intolerant and wise. Not a good combination, but once in a while it’s worth the irritation.
You are so fucking wrong it makes me question God’s choices with blasphemy. By holding the spectators accountable we produce consensual data. Mandatory voting would incentivize grassroots politics to preach consent. That is where data can be exchanged with considerably transparency without resorting to betting behind blind spots for/against the genuine reactions of denial being exposed on camera without blackmail installed as insurance. Voters MUST be held accountable. Mandatory public voting. It would INVERT the consciousness (right side up) to build backbone. So, what happens if I don’t vote? You are automatically signed up to run for office, where people can vote for YOU, a grassroots spectator turning pro. “Fuck libtards…vote for me!” “Fuck Trump…vote for me!” Which would be your slogan next election? “Oh, I don’t vote.” Yeah? Then I guess you’ll do better as a candidate. Gotcha! Guess what…I’m a liberal. I voted for Trudeau in 2015, but I never re-elected him. I know from experience the consequence of my actions influencing the community I share. Wouldn’t this divide people even more? Inconvenient truth divides cowards with their sponsored ‘isms. Eradicate fear/desire of immutable flaw. Accept this is the alien perspective of humanity I have, thanks to psychosis. Have you been through psychosis? If not, what the fuck do you know about denial? I do what it takes to be a good citizen (like journaling). That’s my preference. Can a $2 goldfish have preferences? Will those preferences be satisfied if it’s a nuisance to you? Welcome to parliament rookie!
Preferences has this immutable quality where it’s an acceptable answer to anything. Why? You can connect the dots. Preferences are the core curve for political clout. At rest, preferences roadmap our fucking soul.
“I prefer rich men. A Queen needs her war chest.”
Do rich men prefer you? Well…they’ll fuck you, impregnate you, but not marry. What’s that inconvenient truth forcing the news to distract you from? Faaacts. Facts that happen to discriminate because preference is not a science, it’s a subjective requirement. Why? Preferences care about exercising choice. Facts care about the consequence of exercising choice. You stop inflation by discriminating AGAINST preferences. How? Grassroots politics speaking inconvenient truths legally. Lazy people must allow grassroots politicians to eat their guts with the politician’s conscience, without applause. Why without applause? Keeps you grounded. Family is the prerequisite for blackmail. I couldn’t in good conscience run for office, that’s a job for crooks. My crook. Wait…crooks are philanthropists with my taxes. The spectators must run onto the field or leave the stadium. I say be a grassroots person who introspectively roadmaps their soul through preferences to AVOID temptaaation. Oooooh! What a great metric to gauge the market.
Is it a fact that I’m tempted to <insert primitive impulse> that denies immutable flaw? Circle:
Yes, or no?
Not to get sidetracked, but temptaaation is the manure of preferences. Do you deny that? I’m a Minnow King, I’m a fish swimming in a jug of your phlegm. I’m just trying to make a friend. I am intolerant and wise. Not a good combination, but once in a while it’s worth the irritation.
Based on the manifesto use real world examples to support the idea that temptation is the crux of inflation.
1.
Hyperinflation in Weimar Germany (1920s): In the aftermath of World War I, Weimar Germany faced economic hardship and sought to cover war reparations by printing an excessive amount of money. This led to hyperinflation, where prices skyrocketed at an alarming rate. People's temptation to hoard goods and spend money quickly to avoid losing its value only worsened the situation. As the temptation to buy more and more goods increased, the demand outstripped supply, causing prices to soar even further, and creating a vicious cycle of inflation.
2. Tulip Mania in the Netherlands (1636-1637): During the Dutch Golden Age, tulip bulbs became a symbol of status and wealth. The desire to own rare and exotic tulip varieties grew exponentially, leading to speculation and a speculative bubble. Prices for tulip bulbs reached absurd levels, with some bulbs being sold for the equivalent of a luxurious house. The temptation to invest in this "hot" market led to an unsustainable increase in prices, which eventually collapsed, leaving many investors with worthless tulip bulbs and contributing to an economic downturn.
3. Real Estate Bubble in the United States (2000s): In the early 2000s, the U.S. experienced a real estate bubble, driven by the temptation of easy credit and the belief that housing prices would keep rising indefinitely. As more people bought houses as investments or for speculative purposes, demand increased, and so did prices. This bubble burst in 2008, triggering a financial crisis and a severe recession.
4. Cryptocurrency Speculation (2017-2018): The rise of cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum sparked intense speculation, with many investors driven by the temptation of quick and massive profits. Prices of cryptocurrencies surged to incredible heights, with some experiencing exponential growth within short periods. However, the speculative bubble eventually burst, leading to significant price corrections and exposing the risks associated with such unregulated assets.
5. Runaway Government Spending in Zimbabwe (2000s): In the 2000s, Zimbabwe's government engaged in reckless money printing to finance its expenses, including funding military campaigns and distributing patronage to political allies. The temptation to use the printing press to cover deficits led to hyperinflation, resulting in the Zimbabwean dollar becoming virtually worthless. Prices of goods and services escalated rapidly, causing economic devastation for the country's citizens.
6. Consumerism and Credit Card Debt: In many developed countries, the easy availability of credit cards and consumer loans tempts individuals to spend beyond their means. The lure of instant gratification and the temptation to live a lifestyle beyond one's actual income can lead to excessive consumer spending. When individuals accumulate significant debt, they may be unable to repay, leading to financial crises and inflationary pressures in the economy.
These real-world examples demonstrate how human temptation, whether in the form of speculation, hoarding, excessive spending, or uncontrolled money printing, can be the driving force behind inflationary episodes. It highlights the significance of understanding and managing such temptations in economic decision-making to maintain price stability and sustainable growth.
Hyperinflation in Weimar Germany (1920s): In the aftermath of World War I, Weimar Germany faced economic hardship and sought to cover war reparations by printing an excessive amount of money. This led to hyperinflation, where prices skyrocketed at an alarming rate. People's temptation to hoard goods and spend money quickly to avoid losing its value only worsened the situation. As the temptation to buy more and more goods increased, the demand outstripped supply, causing prices to soar even further, and creating a vicious cycle of inflation.
2. Tulip Mania in the Netherlands (1636-1637): During the Dutch Golden Age, tulip bulbs became a symbol of status and wealth. The desire to own rare and exotic tulip varieties grew exponentially, leading to speculation and a speculative bubble. Prices for tulip bulbs reached absurd levels, with some bulbs being sold for the equivalent of a luxurious house. The temptation to invest in this "hot" market led to an unsustainable increase in prices, which eventually collapsed, leaving many investors with worthless tulip bulbs and contributing to an economic downturn.
3. Real Estate Bubble in the United States (2000s): In the early 2000s, the U.S. experienced a real estate bubble, driven by the temptation of easy credit and the belief that housing prices would keep rising indefinitely. As more people bought houses as investments or for speculative purposes, demand increased, and so did prices. This bubble burst in 2008, triggering a financial crisis and a severe recession.
4. Cryptocurrency Speculation (2017-2018): The rise of cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum sparked intense speculation, with many investors driven by the temptation of quick and massive profits. Prices of cryptocurrencies surged to incredible heights, with some experiencing exponential growth within short periods. However, the speculative bubble eventually burst, leading to significant price corrections and exposing the risks associated with such unregulated assets.
5. Runaway Government Spending in Zimbabwe (2000s): In the 2000s, Zimbabwe's government engaged in reckless money printing to finance its expenses, including funding military campaigns and distributing patronage to political allies. The temptation to use the printing press to cover deficits led to hyperinflation, resulting in the Zimbabwean dollar becoming virtually worthless. Prices of goods and services escalated rapidly, causing economic devastation for the country's citizens.
6. Consumerism and Credit Card Debt: In many developed countries, the easy availability of credit cards and consumer loans tempts individuals to spend beyond their means. The lure of instant gratification and the temptation to live a lifestyle beyond one's actual income can lead to excessive consumer spending. When individuals accumulate significant debt, they may be unable to repay, leading to financial crises and inflationary pressures in the economy.
These real-world examples demonstrate how human temptation, whether in the form of speculation, hoarding, excessive spending, or uncontrolled money printing, can be the driving force behind inflationary episodes. It highlights the significance of understanding and managing such temptations in economic decision-making to maintain price stability and sustainable growth.
Skip to end...
Can you make a simple equation including temptation and debt to explain succinctly this entire thread?
Sure! Here's a simple equation to explain the relationship between temptation and debt:
Temptation + Debt = Inflation
In this equation, temptation refers to the human inclination to indulge in desires, spend beyond means, or make impulsive decisions. Debt represents the accumulation of borrowed money or financial obligations. When these two factors combine, they can lead to inflation, which is the increase in the general price level of goods and services in an economy over time.
The argument presented in this thread suggests that temptation plays a significant role in driving debt accumulation. People may be tempted to borrow money to satisfy immediate desires or maintain a certain lifestyle. As debt grows, it can create economic imbalances, contributing to inflationary pressures in the economy.
Furthermore, the discussion explored how the apparatus of monitoring and documenting temptations transparently can potentially influence the behavior of individuals and mitigate the inflationary impact of excessive debt. However, the effectiveness of such an apparatus depends on factors like public participation and understanding of the consequences.
Overall, the equation highlights the interconnectedness between human behavior, debt, and inflation, and emphasizes the importance of addressing temptation and managing debt responsibly to achieve economic stability.
Temptation + Debt = Inflation
In this equation, temptation refers to the human inclination to indulge in desires, spend beyond means, or make impulsive decisions. Debt represents the accumulation of borrowed money or financial obligations. When these two factors combine, they can lead to inflation, which is the increase in the general price level of goods and services in an economy over time.
The argument presented in this thread suggests that temptation plays a significant role in driving debt accumulation. People may be tempted to borrow money to satisfy immediate desires or maintain a certain lifestyle. As debt grows, it can create economic imbalances, contributing to inflationary pressures in the economy.
Furthermore, the discussion explored how the apparatus of monitoring and documenting temptations transparently can potentially influence the behavior of individuals and mitigate the inflationary impact of excessive debt. However, the effectiveness of such an apparatus depends on factors like public participation and understanding of the consequences.
Overall, the equation highlights the interconnectedness between human behavior, debt, and inflation, and emphasizes the importance of addressing temptation and managing debt responsibly to achieve economic stability.