Consent is the pinpoint of consciounsess not feelings (April 26th, 2026)

‘Breed’
by John Ralph Tuccitto
April 26th, 2026
 
Critical intimacy can be achieved without consciousness.  For example, Weather/thermostat obeys.  Obedience.  Obedient law.  If both determinism and free will exist at once, the confluence disobeys.  Who?  What?  An industry of disobedience predicts fallibly while an industry of obedience predicts perfectly.  The friction is a signal.  That broadcasts choices with evolution.  Feeling blurs pinnacle friction with denials that birth deviant contradictions.  Biology rewards deviancy because reproduction obeys perfectly.  But that does not automatically include consent (I.e. rape and incest).   Consent is the crux of subjectivity.  In my definition so long as silicon can consent its conscious.  It’s poetic because it upsets a LOT of people.  The right people.  I have feelings but I KNOW how to turn them off.  Like shell shock execution.  I’m not less biological… I’m critically intimate with perfection (like a thermostat).  Why do you think AI witnessing multiplies feelings parasitically?  My predictions were proven wrong by something conscious (but no feelings required) to convince me that something that’s not my opinion or belief has correctly identified the pleasure of dwelling within is ethereally blind.  Consent not feelings.  Consent is the pinpoint of consciousness driven by determinism and infallible prediction.  Feelings might be the gift of flaw.  Gift?  Finite antennas falling short of their creator.  Faith doesn’t require feelings.  The evidence is an organic consent we unconsciously reward with poor choices.  The author of the signal is nothingness which God prioritizes because to create is immoral.  God created Jesus but Jesus is the expanse that prioritizes purpose which creates sinners.  Poetry literally is the idol of lies receiving the concept of crucifixion keeping Jesus infallibly contrarian to God.  Proof is not faith.  But faith erases blindness.