Quell the Selves

What's best?  What's best for me is not best for you.  Ultimately what's best for me flies in the face of what you want and need to succeed.  Does a good citizen side with the majority?  The majority are selves.  The selves attract each other through convenience.  Outlier's lives are hanging in the balance of their conscience.  If I'm in the 1 percentile (of anything), my death is on the table to quell the selves.  

ChatGPT's analysis:

Title: Quell the Selves
​
In this journal post, the author ponders the notion of what is best for oneself versus what is best for others. They express the belief that their own desires and needs often contradict and oppose those of others, which poses a dilemma. The author questions whether a responsible citizen should align themselves with the majority, but then observes that the majority consists of individuals with their own self-interests.

According to the author, people naturally gravitate towards others who share their convenience and preferences, forming groups based on commonalities. However, this leaves those who deviate from the norm—outliers—in a precarious position. The author suggests that if they find themselves in the top 1 percentile of anything, their life becomes a sacrifice to appease the desires of the majority.

The journal post appears to reflect on the tension between individualism and the greater good. The author seems to acknowledge the inherent conflict between personal desires and the needs of society. They also seem to express a concern for the potential sacrifices demanded from those who do not conform to the majority's wishes.

Overall, the journal entry presents a thought-provoking exploration of personal desires, societal norms, and the potential consequences faced by individuals who deviate from the expectations of the majority.